# Summary: Factory Physics | 9781577667391 | Wallace J Hopp • This + 400k other summaries
• A unique study and practice tool
• Never study anything twice again
• Get the grades you hope for
• 100% sure, 100% understanding
Remember faster, study better. Scientifically proven. ## Read the summary and the most important questions on Factory Physics | 9781577667391 | Wallace J. Hopp

• ### 2 Inventory Control

This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 2

• #### What is the key insight of EOQ

There is a tradeoff between lot size and inventory

• #### What is the difference between the base stock and the Q r inventory models

in the q,r model the ordering costs are non-negligible

Setup cost

• ### 2.2 The Economic Order Quantity Model

This is a preview. There are 4 more flashcards available for chapter 2.2

• #### Consider figure 2.1. To which assumptions can the vertical lines at intervals nQ/D (with n = 1, 2, 3 ... n) be attributed? (Why are they vertical?)

Assumption 1 & 2. The vertical line represents instantaneous production and immediate delivery, and more so, a perfect overlap and similar timing between them.

• #### How is assumption 4 represented in figure 2.1?

Assumption 4: represented in the oblique lines. Since demand is constant over time, the inventory level decreases constant over time as well, resulting in an oblique line.

• #### Based on the 6 assumptions, figure 2.1 should actually be incorrect. How? What extra assumptions are made here?

According to assumption 6, products can be analyzed individually. This means that the oblique lines in figure 2.1 should actually not be smooth. Instead, inventory should be decreasing incrementally.
For modeling purposes, time and product are represented as continuous quantities.

• #### A manager calculates an optimal order quantity Q* = 23,4 for product X, with an optimal order interval T* = 2,6 weeks. Yet he decides to order every 2 weeks in order quantity Q'. What is Q', what are the effects on the costs and what could be the reason for the manager to use this different strategy?

D = Q* / T* = 9 products per week. Q' = T' ⋅ D = 2 ⋅ 9 = 18 products.

Effect on costs (see 2.2.4): Y(Q')/Y* = 0,5 (Q'/Q* + Q*/Q') = 1,035. This means a 3,5% increase in costs.

Reason: to order items at intervals given by powers of 2 to facilitate the sharing of resources in a multi-product environment (e.g. delivery trucks)

• #### In 2.2.3 a key insight is presented as: 'there is a tradeoff between lot size and inventory'. Does this mean lot size goes down as inventory goes up?

No,  a larger lot size leads to a larger inventory. A larger lot size leads to a lower order frequency. This means that a higher order frequency leads to lower lot sizes and lower inventory levels. There are decreasing returns however, as shown in figure 2.3.

• #### Give the expression for the total (inventory, setup, and production) cost per year with relation to the EOQ model

Y(Q) = ((hQ)/2)+((AD)/Q) + cD = ((icQ)/2)+((AD)/Q) + cD

• #### For which lot size Q is the total annual cost Y(Q) minimized?

For the value of Q for which the holding cost and setup cost are exactly balanced (i.e. the hQ/D and AD/Q cost curves cross).