 This + 400k other summaries
 A unique study and practice tool
 Never study anything twice again
 Get the grades you hope for
 100% sure, 100% understanding
A snapshot of the summary  Factory Physics

2 Inventory Control
This is a preview. There are 1 more flashcards available for chapter 2
Show more cards here 
What is the key insight of EOQ
There is a tradeoff between lot size and inventory

What is the difference between the base stock and the Q r inventory models
in the q,r model the ordering costs are nonnegligible

How did Harris (1913) defined the sum of the labor and material costs to ready the shop to produce a product?
Setup cost

2.2 The Economic Order Quantity Model
This is a preview. There are 4 more flashcards available for chapter 2.2
Show more cards here 
Consider figure 2.1. To which assumptions can the vertical lines at intervals nQ/D (with n = 1, 2, 3 ... n) be attributed? (Why are they vertical?)
Assumption 1 & 2. The vertical line represents instantaneous production and immediate delivery, and more so, a perfect overlap and similar timing between them.

How is assumption 4 represented in figure 2.1?
Assumption 4: represented in the oblique lines. Since demand is constant over time, the inventory level decreases constant over time as well, resulting in an oblique line.

Based on the 6 assumptions, figure 2.1 should actually be incorrect. How? What extra assumptions are made here?
According to assumption 6, products can be analyzed individually. This means that the oblique lines in figure 2.1 should actually not be smooth. Instead, inventory should be decreasing incrementally.
For modeling purposes, time and product are represented as continuous quantities. 
A manager calculates an optimal order quantity Q* = 23,4 for product X, with an optimal order interval T* = 2,6 weeks. Yet he decides to order every 2 weeks in order quantity Q'. What is Q', what are the effects on the costs and what could be the reason for the manager to use this different strategy?
D = Q* / T* = 9 products per week. Q' = T' ⋅ D = 2 ⋅ 9 = 18 products.
Effect on costs (see 2.2.4): Y(Q')/Y* = 0,5 (Q'/Q* + Q*/Q') = 1,035. This means a 3,5% increase in costs.
Reason: to order items at intervals given by powers of 2 to facilitate the sharing of resources in a multiproduct environment (e.g. delivery trucks)

In 2.2.3 a key insight is presented as: 'there is a tradeoff between lot size and inventory'. Does this mean lot size goes down as inventory goes up?
No, a larger lot size leads to a larger inventory. A larger lot size leads to a lower order frequency. This means that a higher order frequency leads to lower lot sizes and lower inventory levels. There are decreasing returns however, as shown in figure 2.3.

Give the expression for the total (inventory, setup, and production) cost per year with relation to the EOQ model
Y(Q) = ((hQ)/2)+((AD)/Q) + cD = ((icQ)/2)+((AD)/Q) + cD

For which lot size Q is the total annual cost Y(Q) minimized?
For the value of Q for which the holding cost and setup cost are exactly balanced (i.e. the hQ/D and AD/Q cost curves cross).
 Higher grades + faster learning
 Don't study anything twice
 100% sure, 100% understanding
The following topics are covered in this summary

cs, inventory, model

standard, function, variance

demand, mrp, orders

production, achieve, zero

units, hours, month

revolutionary, factory, time

transformation, buffer, essential

less, high, quality

cost, model, tactical

line, wip, qaanswernotes

policy, manufacturing, time

cv, process, mv

machine, process, 0, 5

time, arrivals, machine

process, buffer, times

machine, blocking, buffer

variability, system, times

average, utilization, ct

batch, transfer, time

batch, time, batches

values, ideal, inventory

time, times, process

system, pull, true

wip, pull, variability

wip, line, mva

system, conwip, push

interface, conwip, cards

release, rework, time

term, planning, control

forecasting, models, values

planning, parameter, system

planning, workforce, line

sfc, function, wip

bottleneck, production, capacity

0, 3, station, assembly

pfb, bottleneck, strategy